| FORESTED WETLANDS | |
| United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Natural Resources Conservation Service United States Army Corps of Engineers United States Environmental Protection Agency United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NA-PR-01-95 |
![]() Functions, Benefits and the Use of Best Management Practices |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Introduction | |||||||||||||||||||
| Definition | |||||||||||||||||||
| Trends | |||||||||||||||||||
| Wetland Classification | |||||||||||||||||||
| Hydrology | |||||||||||||||||||
| Soils | |||||||||||||||||||
| Vegetation | |||||||||||||||||||
| Biogeochemical Cycles | |||||||||||||||||||
| Wildlife | |||||||||||||||||||
| Organic Soil Wetlands | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Mineral Soil Wetlands | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Wetlands Best Management
Practices |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Three Primary Considerations | |||||||||||||||||||
| Planning | |||||||||||||||||||
| Access Systems | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Streamsides and Stream Crossings | |||||||||||||||||||
| Felling Practices | |||||||||||||||||||
| Silviculture | |||||||||||||||||||
| Wildlife and Fish | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Legal Requirements | |||||||||||||||||||
| Where to go for Assistance | |||||||||||||||||||
References |
| Additional copies of this publication can be obtained from U.S.D.A.
Forest Service, Northeastern Area, 5 Radnor Corporate Center, P.O. Box 6775,
Radnor, PA 19087-8775. If you find this publication helpful, please write and tell us how you used it. Front Cover: Heaths are a common bog vegetation, as suggested by "Big Heath," the local name for this black spruce bog in Maine. (Photo: Donald J. Leopold) Back Cover: Labrador Pond, apoor fen in New York (Photos: Donald J. Leopold) |
| Forested Wetlands Functions, Benefits and the Use of Best Management Practices |
| AUTHORS David J. Welsch Northeastern Area, U.S.D.A. Forest Service David L. Smart U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service James N. Boyer Philadelphia District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Paul Minkin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III Howard C. Smith U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Tamara L. McCandless U.S.D.l. Fish and Wildlife Service The following people have also contributed significantly to this publication with source materials, writing, editing, ideas and photography. Their efforts are greatly appreciated. Scott Jackson, Dave Kittredge, Sue Campbell, Chris Welch, Alison Whitlock, Joseph Larson Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Massachusetts; Mike Phillips, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; Larry Klotz and Randy Cassell, Shippensburg University, PA; Joe Emerick, Cambria County Conservation District, PA-1 Jim Soper, Carmine Angeloni, Conrad Ohman, and Jack Jackson, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management; Eric Johnson, Northern Logger and Timber Processor Magazine; Mike Love, Blanchard Machinery Co.; John Conkey Logging Inc. -I Barbara Hoffert Graphic Design, Doug Wechsler, Vireo Project, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia; Paul Wiegman, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy-, Tony Wilkinson, Nature Conservancy; Kathy Reagan, Adirondack Conservancy-, Robert Gutowski, Ann Rhoads, Morris Arboretum, University of Pennsylvania; Donald Leopold, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York; James Finley, Pennsylvania State University; Steve Koehn, Maryland Department of Natural Resources; Bob Tjaden, Delaware Department of Agriculture; David Savielkis, Delaware Division of Water Resources-, Barbara D'Angelo, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region 111; Paul Nickerson, Diane Eckles, U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service-, Richard Wyman, E.N. Huyck Biological Research Station, NY; Tom Ilvari, Bob Franzen, Carl Langlois, Barry Isaacs, Bob Wengrzynek, U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service-, Gerald Tussing, Top of Ohio, Resource Conservation and Development Area, John Lanier, Vermont, Department of Fish and Wildlife-, Mary Davis, U.S.A. Corps of Engineers-, Lola Mason, Elon S. Verry, Jim Hornbeck, Ed Corbett, Steve Horsley, Gary Wade, Bill Healy, Lionel Lemery, Bill Moriarity, Nancy Salminen, Elizabeth Crane, Gordon Stuart, Mark Cleveland, Jackie Twiss, Jim Lockyear, Roxane Palone, Karen Sykes, Toni McLellan, Mike Majeski, Rich Wiest, Constance Carpenter, John Currier, Gary Peters, U.S.D.A. Forest Service. |
INTRODUCTION |
Wetlands are complex and fascinating ecosystems that
perform a variety of functions of vital importance to the environment and to
the society whose very existence depends on the quality of the environment.
Wetlands regulate water flow by detaining storm flows for short periods thus
reducing flood peaks.
Wetlands protect lake shore and coastal
areas by buffering the erosive action of waves and other storm effects.
Wetlands improve water quality by retaining or transforming excess nutrients
and by trapping sediment and heavy metals. Wetlands provide many wildlife
habitat components such as breeding grounds, nesting sites and other critical
habitat for a variety of fish and wildlife species as well as the unique
habitat requirements of many threat ened and endangered plants and animals.
Wetlands also provide a bounty of plant and animal products such as
blueberries, cranberries, timber, fiber, finfish, shellfish, waterfowl,
furbearers and game animals. Although wetlands are generally beneficial, they
can, at times, adversely affect water quality. Waters leaving wetlands have
shown elevated coliform counts, reduced oxygen content and color values that
exceed the standard for drinking water. While many wetland functions are unaffected by land management activities, some functions can be compromised or enhanced by land management activities. Deforestation, for instance, can reduce or eliminate the ability of a wetland to reduce flood peaks. On the other hand, retaining forest vegetation on a wetland can help retain the ability of the soil to absorb runoff water thus reducing peak flood flows. In addition, management of the forest can actually improve wildlife habitat and produce revenue to offset the cost of retaining the wetland for flood control. The key is to recognize environmental values and incorporate them into management decisions. The purpose of this publication is to provide an understanding of .some of the environmental Junctions and societal values of wetlands and to present an array of Best Management Practices, or BMP's. Best management practices are devices and procedures to be considered and used us necessary to protect the environmental,function.s and societal values of wetlands during harvesting and other,fore.st management operations. |
| Go To Next
Chapter Back to Table of Contents |
DEFINITION |
| The term "wetlands" includes a variety of transitional areas
where land based and water based ecosystems overlap. They have long been known
to us by more traditional terms such as bog, marsh, fen and swamp. And while
most people use these terms interchangeably, to many who study wetlands these
terms have specific meanings which richly describe the various wetland
environments they represent. However, before discussing the meaning of these
traditional terms, we should look first at some general definitions of
wetlands. One of the earliest of the currently important definitions, often referred to as the Circular 39 definition, was developed by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service as part of a wetland classification system for categorizing waterfowl habitat. This classification is still used to differentiate between various wetland types for wildlife habitat purposes. Wetlands of the United States, Their Extent and Their Value for Waterfowl and Other Wildlife (Shaw and Fredine 1956) Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987) |
|||||
| Wetlands are lands transitional between terrestrial and
aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface or the
land is covered by shallow water... wetlands must have one or more of the
following three attributes: (1) at least periodically, the land supports
predominantly hydrophytes; (2) the substrate is predominantly undrained hydric
soil; and (3) the substrate is nonsoil and is saturated with water or covered
by shallow water at some time during, the growing season of each year.
" Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al., 1979) |
|||||
| These definitions are descriptions of the physical attributes of
wetlands and are used chiefly to identify wetlands for regulatory purposes, but
wetlands are more than physical places where water is present and certain
plants grow. Wetlands perform a variety of unique physical, chemical and
biological functions which are essential to the health of the environment and
valuable to society, but which are also difficult to define or identify for
regulatory purposes. Wetlands exist between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and are, therefore, influenced by both. Wetlands are lands where water is present on the soil surface or within the root zone of plants, usually within about 18 inches of the soil surface. Because of the presence of water, wetlands have soil properties which differ from upland areas. Only hydrophytes, plants that are adapted to an environment where water is present in the root zone either permanently or for extended periods of time, can survive in such soils. The type of soil, the amount of organic matter, the depth to which the water table will rise, the climate, and the season and duration of high water will determine the kinds of plants that will grow in a wetland. Therefore, wetland types are identified, in part, by the kinds of plants that grow in them and the degree of surface flooding or the degree of soil saturation due to a high water table. Any of these definitions may suffice for the purposes of protection and enhancement of wetland functions. However, for regulatory purposes, it is important to know that there are several similar definitions in common use, but the one that currently applies for the regulatory purposes of the Clean Water Act is the 1987 Corps of Engineers definition. |
![]() It is easier to avoid negative impacts on wetlands if the land in question is recognized as wetland at the beginning of the planning process. Identifying wetlands when the land is inundated or flooded with water is not difficult, but wetlands are not always inundated and many wetlands are never inundated. ![]() Therefore, it is necessary to be able to identify wetlands by other means. While identification and delineation of wetlands under the Clean Water Act is a complex process involving soils, plant communities and hydrology, there are a number of easily recognized signs that can be used as indicators that the area may be a wetland and that it thus deserves further investigation.
|
![]() |
Wetland Characteristics Water presence of water at or near the ground surface for a part of the year. Hydrophytic Plants a preponderance of plants adapted to wet conditions Hydric Soils soil developed under wet conditions |
![]() ![]() |
Go To Next Chapter Back to Table of Contents |